نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار گروه علوم سیاسی و روابط بینالملل، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران.
2 گروه علوم سیاسی، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
In recent years, the securitization of migration has become a central issue in regional security analysis—a phenomenon driven by multiple variables, including war and military conflicts, political instability, terrorism, natural disasters, and environmental problems. The return of the Taliban to power in Afghanistan and the continuation of internal conflicts in Syria since 2011 have pushed millions of people toward the borders of Iran and Turkey. Alongside large-scale migration for economic motives, this has created a particular security situation for both countries. Employing a qualitative and comparative approach, based on a case-comparison method and within the theoretical framework of the Regional Security Complex Theory (Copenhagen School), this study offers a comparative analysis of the securitization process of migration in Iran and Turkey and its consequences. The findings indicate that large-scale refugee flows from Afghanistan and Syria—stemming from war and internal conflicts—have been clearly securitized in both countries, extending beyond economic impacts and transforming into identity-based and security threats, the management of which requires cooperation between the two states. In this regard, diplomacy in the form of "friendship patterns" can play a significant role in addressing security concerns related to migration and enhancing cross-border cooperation. Furthermore, this paper introduces the concept of "migration diplomacy"—a concept through which states can engage in negotiating and implementing migration management agreements, including border controls, visa policies, and cooperation on security matters related to migration.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)