نقش خبرگان سنتی روستا در راهبری بسترسازی مشارکت مردمی در اقدامات توسعه‌ای محلی (مورد مطالعه: تجربۀ اجتماعات روستائی کردستان)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

گروه پژوهشی مدیریت و علوم اجتماعی، پژوهشکدۀ مطالعات سیاست‌گذاری و حکمرانی، پژوهشگاه نیرو، تهران، ایران

10.22034/jbpd.2026.145593.1039

چکیده

هدف: پژوهش حاضر با هدف شناسایی سازوکارهای راهبری خبرگان سنتی در بسترسازی مشارکت مردمی برای اقدامات توسعه‌ای انجام شده است. بدین منظور، ابتدا با اشاره به تعدادی از پروژه‌های توسعه‌ای دولتی و نیز اقدامات و برنامه‌های مردم‌محور در روستاهای مورد مطالعه، پرسش‌هایی تدوین شد که بر اساس آن، نقش روحانیون و ریش‌سفیدان به‌عنوان خبرگان سنتی روستا در فراهمسازی زمینهٔ مشارکت و همراهی مردم با اقدامات توسعه‌ای بررسی گردد. به عبارتی دیگر، این پرسش مطرح شد که آنان چگونه و طی چه فرایندی، مردم را برای پذیرش و مشارکت در اقدامات توسعه‌ای آماده و متقاعد می‌سازند.خبرگان و گروه‌های مرجع روستایی، سرآمدانی هستند که در عرصه‌های مختلف روستا، صاحب ایده و دانش نوین یا بومی بوده و از اقتدار و مشروعیت لازم برای پیشبرد امور روستا برخوردارند. این افراد در مواردی دارای توانمندی‌های دیگری نیز هستند که متناسب با نیازهای روستا شکل گرفته و نوعی برتری برای آنان محسوب می‌شود. این سرآمدان، از جمله سرمایه‌ها و ظرفیت‌های کلیدی روستا در پیشبرد فرایندهای گوناگون توسعه‌ای به شمار می‌روند.رویکردهای نظری توسعه محلی نظیر توسعه مشارکتی، پساتوسعه، دانش بومی و توسعه محلی دارایی‌مبنا، بر اهمیت استفاده از ظرفیت‌های محلی در بهبود وضعیت اجتماعات محلی تأکید دارند. این ظرفیت‌ها شامل مشارکت، سرمایه اجتماعی، سرمایه فیزیکی، سرمایه‌های فکری و به‌ویژه دانش بومی اجتماع محلی است. سوالی که این پژوهش دنبال می‌کند، این است که خبرگان سنتی در اجتماعات روستایی کردستان با چه سازوکارهایی، بسترسازی جلب مشارکت مردم در اقدامات توسعه‌ای محلی را راهبری می‌کنند؟
روش: روش پژوهش حاضر مبتنی بر روش‌شناسی کیفی با راهبرد قوم‌نگاری بوده که در داده‌یابی و تحلیل مضمونی در داده‌کاوی تلاش شده تا سازوکارهای راهبری این خبرگان در اجتماعات روستایی شهرستانِ سردشت جهت بسترسازی مشارکت مردمی در اقدامات توسعه‌ای دولت‌محور و مردم‌محور با تمرکز بر طرح‌های خدمات‌رسانی آب و برق، عمرانی و حفاظت از محیط زیست توصیف و تحلیل شوداست.  
محدوده مطالعه، روستاهای شهرستان سردشت در استان آذربایجان غربی (به‌عنوان یکی از مناطق کردنشین ایران) انتخاب گردید. با توجه به امکان‌پذیر نبودن پژوهش در تمامی روستاهای شهرستان، تحقیق در شش روستای واقع در دهستان بریاجی از بخش مرکزی انجام شد. روش‌شناسی پژوهش، کیفی و با راهبرد مردم‌نگاری مبتنی بر مصاحبه‌های عمیق و مشاهده میدانی برای گردآوری داده‌ها و نیز تحلیل مضمونی برای تحلیل داده‌ها بود. برای گردآوری داده‌ها، تمامی افراد و گروه‌های اجتماع محلی که در راهبری و مدیریت امور عمومی روستا به‌ویژه اقدامات توسعه‌ای مورد مراجعه بودند، با استفاده از نمونه‌گیری هدفمند از نوع گلوله‌برفی شناسایی شدند. چهار گروه اصلی از این جایگاه برخوردار بودند: روحانیون، ریش‌سفیدان، شوراهای اسلامی و دهیاران. ارزیابی کیفیت داده‌ها و نتایج پژوهش (قابلیت اعتماد) از طریق تنوع منابع داده، مقابله‌سازی داده‌ها با یکدیگر و نیز تأیید یافته‌ها توسط مصاحبه‌شوندگان صورت گرفته است.
یافته‎ ها:  تحلیل مضمونی داده‌ها در پاسخ به سؤال اصلی پژوهش، بیانگر سه سازوکار اصلی است: تعامل با مردم و دستگاه‌های اجرائی؛ شناسایی و بهره‌گیری از ظرفیت‌های محلی؛و آگاه‌سازی و ارائه ایده.بر اساس یافته‌ها، روحانیون و ریش‌سفیدان به‌عنوان خبرگان سنتی، توانسته‌اند از طریق تعامل مؤثر با مردم، سایر خبرگان و دستگاه‌های اجرایی، همچنین شناسایی و بهره‌گیری از ظرفیت‌های محلی و در نهایت آگاه‌سازی و ارائه ایده، بسترهای لازم را برای توجیه و متقاعدسازی مردم جهت موافقت با اجرا و مشارکت در اقدامات توسعه‌ای فراهم آورند.
نتیجه: نتایج این پژوهش تا حدود زیادی با چارچوب‌های نظری توسعه محلی که بر سازوکارهای زمینه‌سازی اجتماع‌محور و بومی تأکید دارند، همخوانی دارد. سیاست‌گذاری‌های دولت می‌تواند با توجه به این ظرفیت‌های بومی و محلی، زمینه مناسبی را برای تحقق توسعه محلی مردم‌گرایانه فراهم نماید.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Role of Traditional Village Elites in Leadership to Providing Context for Public Participation in Community Development Activities

نویسنده [English]

  • Jamal Abdollahpour
Management and Social Sciences Research department, Research Centure for Policy and Governance Studies, Niroo (Energy) Research Institute, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Objective: The present study aims to identify the mechanisms through which traditional elites lead the process of building public participation in development actions. To this end, drawing on a number of state-led development projects as well as community-based initiatives in the studied villages, a set of questions was formulated to examine the role of clerics and elders—as traditional rural elites—in facilitating the context for people's participation and cooperation with development actions. In other words, the question was raised as to how and through what process they prepare and persuade people to accept and participate in development actions. Rural elites and reference groups are distinguished individuals who possess innovative or indigenous knowledge and ideas in various rural domains, and enjoy the necessary authority and legitimacy to advance rural affairs. In some cases, they also possess other capabilities shaped in accordance with the needs of the village, which constitute a form of superiority for them. These distinguished figures are among the key assets and capacities of the village in driving various development processes. Theoretical approaches to local development—such as participatory development, post-development, indigenous knowledge, and asset-based local development—emphasize the importance of utilizing local capacities to improve the condition of local communities. These capacities include participation, social capital, physical capital, intellectual capital, and particularly the indigenous knowledge of the local community. The research question pursued by this study is: What mechanisms do traditional elites in the rural communities of Kurdistan use to lead the process of building public participation in local development actions?
Method: The methodology of the present study is based on a qualitative approach with an ethnographic strategy. In data collection and thematic analysis, efforts were made to describe and analyze the leadership mechanisms of these elites in the rural communities of Sardasht County for building public participation in state-led and community-based development actions, with a focus on water and electricity service projects, civil engineering projects, and environmental protection initiatives. The study area was the villages of Sardasht County in West Azerbaijan Province, as one of the Kurdish regions of Iran. Since it was not feasible to study all rural communities of the county, the research was conducted in six villages located in the Beryaji Rural District of the Central District. The qualitative methodology employed an ethnographic strategy based on in-depth interviews and field observations for data collection, and thematic analysis for data analysis. To collect data, all individuals and groups within the local community who were consulted for leading and managing public affairs, especially development actions, were identified through purposive snowball sampling. Four main groups held this position: clerics, elders, Islamic village councils, and village administrators. The trustworthiness of the data and findings was ensured through data source triangulation and member checking.
Findings: The thematic analysis of the data in response to the main research question revealed three main mechanisms: (1) interaction with people and executive bodies; (2) identifying and utilizing local capacities; and (3) awareness-raising and presenting ideas. According to the findings, clerics and elders—as traditional elites—have been able to provide the necessary grounds for justifying and persuading people to agree to and participate in development actions through effective interaction with people, other elites, and executive bodies; identifying and utilizing local capacities; and raising awareness and presenting ideas.
Conclusion: The results of this study are largely consistent with the theoretical frameworks of local development that emphasize community-based and indigenous context-building mechanisms. Government policies can, by taking these local and indigenous capacities into account, provide a suitable ground for the realization of people-centered local development

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • village
  • community development
  • development activities
  • traditional elites
  • leadership

مراجع

References
Abdollahpour, J. (2017). Vakavi-ye naqsh-e khabargān-e sonnati-ye rustāyi dar rahbari-ye towse'eh-ye ejtemā'āt-e mahalli (mored-e motāle'eh: ejtemā'āt-e rustāyi-ye shahrestān-e Sardasht) [Analyzing the role of traditional rural experts in leading local community development (Case study: Rural communities of Sardasht County)] (Doctoral dissertation). Department of Social Development Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran. (In Persian).
Anbari, M. (2011). Jāme'eh-shenāsi-ye towse'eh: az eghtesād tā farhang [Sociology of development: From economy to culture] (1st ed.). Tehran: SAMT Publications. (In Persian).
Arefi, M. (2001). Be sooy-e ruykard-e dārā'i-mabnā barā-ye towse'eh-ye ejtemā'-e mahalli [Towards an asset-based approach to local community development] (N. Tavalaie, Trans.). Majaleh-ye Honarhā-ye Zibā, (10), 22-33. (In Persian).
Arnstein, S. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 216-224.
Behzad, S. & Ahamad, N. (2012). the role of the community in communities development: promotion of self depende through education, African Journal of Business Management, 6(49).
Bikam, Peter & Chakwizira, James (2014). Involvement of Traditional Leadership in Land Use Planning and Development Projects in South Africa: Lessons for Local Government Planners. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4(13).142-152.
Chambers, Robert (1995). Rural appraisal: Rapid, Relaxed and Participatory. in participatory rural appraisal (methods and applications in rural planning), 1-62, edited by Amitava Mukherjee, first published, New Delhi: Vikas Publishing House PVT LTD.
Chotib, H. M. (2024). The Role of Traditional Leaders in Local Governance: A Case Study of Jambi Province, Indonesia. Enigma in Cultural 2(2):117-130
Crocker, David A. (2006). Sen and Deliberative Democracy. in Alexander Kaufman (ed.), Capabilities Equality: Basic Issues and Problems. New York: Routledge. 
Emadi, M. H., & Abbasi, E. (1999). Hekmat-e dirin dar 'asr-e novin: kār-bord-e dānesh-e boom dar towse'eh-ye pāydār [Ancient wisdom in the new age: Application of indigenous knowledge in sustainable development] (Vol. 1, 1st ed.). Tehran: Jihad-e Sazandegi Ministry Press, Center for Rural Research and Studies. (In Persian).
Escobar, Arturo (1984). Discourse and Power in Development: Michel Foucault and the Relevance of his Work to the Third World. Alternatives, 10(3), 377–400.
Escobar, Arturo (1987). Power and Visibility: The Invention and Management of Development in the Third World. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Escobar, Arturo (1988). Power and Visibility: Development and the Invention and Management of the Third World. Cultural Anthropology, 3(4), 428-443.
Escobar, Arturo (1995). Encountering Development: the making and unmaking of the third world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Escobar, Arturo (2000). Beyond the Search for a Paradigm? Post-development and Beyond. Development, 43 (4), 11–14.
Escobar, Arturo (2004). Beyond the Third World: Imperial Globality, Global Coloniality, and Anti-Globalisation Social Movements. Third World Quarterly, 25 (1), 207–230.
Escobar, Arturo (2007). Post-development as concept and social practice. in Ziai, Aram. Exploring Post-development: Theory and practice, problems and perspectives, First published, New York: Routledge.
Forester, J. (1980). critical theory and planning practice. American planning Assosiation Journal, 46.
Forester, J. (1993). Critical Theory, Public Policy, and Planning Practice: Toward a Critical Pragmatism. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Gaotri, H. (1986). Popular Participation in Development. in Participation in Development, Paris: unesco.
Gershman, Shayna Debra (2013). An Evaluation of Public Participation Techniques Using Arnstein’s Ladder: the Portland plan, a thesis presented to the graduate school of the University of Florida in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Urban and Regional Planning.
Ghaffari, G. R., & Niazi, M. (2007). Jāme'eh-shenāsi-ye moshārekat [Sociology of participation] (1st ed.). Tehran: Nazdik Publications. (In Persian).
Ghorbanian, M., Fasihi Harandi, M., & Liaghat, A. (2019). Bankdāri-ye ejtemā'i-ye āb: bāz-tarif-e rezhimhā-ye hokmravāni-ye āb [Social water banking: Redefining water governance regimes]. Nashriyeh-ye Tahghighāt-e Manābe'-e Āb-e Iran, 15(4), 425-437. (In Persian)
Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant Leadership: A journey into the Nature of Legitimate power and greatness, Paulist Press, New York, NY.
Gutmann, A. and D. Thompson (2000). Why Deliberative Democracy is Different. in Paul, Miller, Jr. and Paul.
Hamed Moghaddam, A. (1990). Moshārekat va towse'eh-ye rustāyi [Participation and rural development]. In Majmooeh-ye maqālāt-e seminār-e jāme'eh-shenāsi-ye towse'eh (Vol. 2). Tehran: SAMT Publications. (In Persian).
Healey, P. (1992). a planners day, knowledge and action in communicative practice. APA Journal, Winter.
Healey, P. (1993). Planning Through Debate: The Communicative Turn in Planning Theory In: F. Fischer, J. Forester: The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, 223-253, UCL press.
Healey, P. (1996). Planning through Debate: the communicative turn in planning theory. reading in planning theory, Blackwell.
Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning, shaping places in fragmented societies. London: Macmillan.
Healey, P. (1999). collaborative planning, shaping places fragmented societies, Macmillan Press I.T.D.
Healey, P. (1999). institutionalist analysis, communicative planning and shaping places. Journal of Planning Education and Research. 
Imani Jajarmi, H., & Abdollahpour, J. (2017). Vakavi-ye mabani-ye mashru'iyat-e eghtedar-e nobegān-e sonnati-ye rustāyi dar rahbari-ye towse'eh-ye ejtemā'-e mahalli (mored-e motāle'eh: ejtemā'āt-e rustāyi-ye shahrestān-e Sardasht) [An analysis of the legitimacy foundations of traditional rural elites' authority in leading local community development (Case study: rural communities of Sardasht County)]. Towse'eh-ye Mahalli (Rustāyi-Shahri), 9(2), 215-238. (In Persian).
Innes, J. E. (1995). Planning theory’s emerging paradigm: Communicative action and interactive practice, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 14(3). 183-189.
Innes, J. E. (1998). information in communicative planning. APA Journal, Winter.
Koontz, H., O'Donnell, C., & Weihrich, H. (2006). Osoul-e modiriyat [Principles of management] (Vol. 2, 5th ed.) (M. A. Toosi, S. A. Alavi, A. A. Farhangi, & A. Mahdavian, Trans.). Tehran: Institute for Management and Planning Studies (IMPS) Press. (In Persian).
Kozel, Valerie & Parker, Barbara (2000). integrated approaches to poverty assassmant in India. in Micheal Bamberger. ed., integrating quantitative and qualitative research in development projects, Washington D. C.: World Bank.
Kretzman, John and John L. Mcknight (1993). building communities from the inside out: a path toward finding and mobilizing a community’s assets, Chicago, IL: ACTA publications.  
Mathie, A. & Cunningham, G. (2003). from clients to citizens: asset-based community development as a strategy for community – driven development, Development in Practice, 13(5), 474-486.
Mohammad, M & Silong, A. D. (2010). leadership roles in community development  in Malasia. Journal of Global Business Management, 6(2).
Morid, S. (2018) Review of national efforts to manage drought and the capacity to face water crises. Iran Water Resources Research 14(1):239-252.
Narayan et al (1997). voices of the poor: poverty and social capital in Tanzania, World Bank. Washington DC, USA.
Narayan, D. (1999). bonds and bridges: social capital and poverty. Policy Research Working Paper.
Omar, S. (1987). Demokrāsi-ye moshārekati [Participatory democracy] (A. Mokhber, Trans.). Tehran: Ministry of Planning and Budget. (In Persian).
Ozor, N and Nwankwo, N. (2008). The Role of Local Leaders in Community Development Programmes in Ideato Local Government Area of Imo State: Implication for Extension Policy. Journal of Agricultural Extension, 12(2).
Rafieian, M., & Maroufi, S. (2011). Naqsh va kār-bord-e ruykard-e barnāmeh-rizi-ye ertebāti dar nazariyehā-ye novin-e shahrsāzi [The role and application of communicative planning approach in new urban planning theories]. Armanshahr, (7), 113-120. (In Persian).
Rahman, M. (1993). People Self Development, London: Zed books.
Rahnema, M. (1993). Lozum-e zabāni tāzeh barā-ye faghr [The need for a new language for poverty]. Goftogu, (2). (In Persian).
Rahnema, M. (1996). Bāz-andishi-ye yek kārgozar-e towse'eh [Rethinking a development agent] (J. Tavakoli, Trans.). Faslnāmeh-ye Rustā va Towse'eh, Bakhsh-e mo'arefi-ye ketāb, 2(3). (In Persian).
Rahnema, M. (1998). "Towse'eh"، negāhi now be mafāhim-e towse'eh ["Development", a new look at the concepts of development] (F. Farrahi & V. Bozorgi, Trans.). Tehran: Markaz Publications. (In Persian).
Rahnema, M. (2006). Hengāmi ke binavāyi faghr rā az sahneh biroun mi-rand [When affluence drives poverty away] (H. Javdani, Trans.). Tehran: Institute for Management and Planning Studies (IMPS). (In Persian).
Rahnema, M., et al. (1975). Āmookhtan barā-ye zistan [Learning to be] (M. Ghazi et al., Trans.). Tehran: Amirkabir Publications. (In Persian).
Rahnema, Majid (1992). Participation, In The Development Dictionary: a Guide to Knowledge as Power, Wolfgang Sachs, ed. London: Zed Books.
Rahnema, Majid and Victoria Bawtree (1997). The Post-Development Reader, London: Zed Books.
Rokneddin Eftekhari, A. R. (2010). Modiriyat-e towse'eh-ye rustāyi (bonyānhā-ye nazari) [Rural development management (Theoretical foundations)] (1st ed.). Tehran: SAMT Publications. (In Persian).
Rokneddin Eftekhari, A. R., & Behzadnasab, J. A. (2004). Barnāmeh-rizi-ye ertebāti, ruykardi enteqādi be nazariyeh-ye barnāmeh-rizi (bā ta'kid bar barnāmeh-rizi-ye towse'eh-ye rustāyi) [Communicative planning, a critical approach to planning theory (With emphasis on rural development planning)]. Faslnāmeh-ye Modarres-e 'Olum-e Ensāni, 8(1), 1-22. (In Persian).
Sager, T. (1994). Communicative Planning Theory, Aldershot: Avebury.
Sarrafi, M. (2013). Towse'eh be masābe-ye hokmravāyi-ye shāyeste [Development as good governance]. In J. E'ta'at, F. Dejpasand, A. Dini Torkamani, M. Sari'olghalam, M. Sarrafi, V. Mahmoudi, & B. Hadi Zanour, Mabāni-ye towse'eh-ye pāydār dar Irān (1st ed., pp. 51-88). Tehran: Elm Publications. (In Persian).
Scott, Wituk, Ealey, Sarah, Jo Clark, Mary, Heiny, Pat and Meissen, Greg (2005). Community Development through Community Leadership Programs: Insights from a Statewide Community Leadership Initiative. community development: Journal of the Community Development Society, 36(2), 89-101.
Sen, A. (2003). Democracy and Its Global Roots. The New Republic, 229 (4), 28-35.
Shatar Sabran, Mohammad (2003). An Introduction to Community Development and Leadership. Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Shojaei Baghini, M. M., et al. (2008). Mabāni-ye mafhumi-ye sarmāyeh-ye ejtemā'i [Conceptual foundations of social capital] (1st ed.). Tehran: Institute for Social and Cultural Studies (ISCS) Press. (In Persian).
Silong, Abu Daud (2009). Leadership Theories, Research and Practice: Framing Future Leadership Thinking, Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Statistical Center of Iran. (2016). Sar-shomāri-ye 'omoumi-ye nofus va maskan-e 1395 [National population and housing census of 2016]. (In Persian).
Tendler, Judith (1997). good government in the tropics, Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Tlhoaele, Clement Timas (2012). the interface between traditional leadership in shared rural local governance. dissertation, master of arts in public management and governance, university of Johannesburg.
Torkzadeh, J., & Jafari, S. (2012). Ruykardhā va nazariyehā-ye sonnati va novin-e rahbari: be sooy-e jahānbini-ye rahbari [Traditional and modern leadership approaches and theories: Towards a leadership worldview]. Faslnāmeh-ye Towse'eh-ye Manābe'-e Ensāni va Poshtibāni, 7(25), 91-134. (In Persian).
Tshitangoni, M., & Francis, J. (2018). Relevance of traditional leadership in rural community development amidst democratic institutions in Southern Africa: A critical review. Studies of Tribes and Tribals, 15(2), 70-83.
Woolcock, M., & Narayan, D. (2008). Sarmāyeh-ye ejtemā'i: kār-bordhā dar nazariyeh-ye towse'eh, pajuhesh va siyāsāt-gozāri [Social capital: Implications for development theory, research, and policy] (M. M. Shojaei Baghini, Trans.). In M. M. Shojaei Baghini et al., Mabāni-ye mafhumi-ye sarmāyeh-ye ejtemā'i (1st ed., pp. 85-134). Tehran: Institute for Social and Cultural Studies (ISCS) Press. (In Persian).
Yusnadi & Syahfitri, R. (2025). Community Empowerment Process Through Tourism Village Program.Journal of Nonformal Education and Community Empowerment. 6(1), 9-16.
Zenzile, E.  (2023). The Experiences of Traditional Leaders in the Execution of Crime Prevention Strategies in the Rural Settings of the or Tambo District Municipality, in the Eastern Cape Province. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, 15(6), 19-28.
 

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 07 اسفند 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 28 اردیبهشت 1405
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 29 اردیبهشت 1405

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار